������

In 2013, ������ was on the cusp of reaching the enrollment requirements to be officially declared a Hispanic-Serving Institution (HSI). But what exactly that would mean was vague. Was it an accolade or just a stat? Would it bring new resources, new responsibilities? 

, professor of educational psychology and higher education, wanted clarity herself and introduced a new special topics course — Understanding Minority-Serving Institutions (MSIs) — to explore the values, missions, characteristics, and issues related to the institutions. 

Her students examined how the federal designation in higher education affected on-campus communities and climate as well as student learning, and engagement. Class discussions were rich, but definitive answers were elusive and policies and programs, sadly, remained largely unchanged in the higher education ecosphere.

These questions were not new as ������ had already attained Asian American and Native Pacific Islander-Serving Institution status (AANAPISI) in 2012. When the HSI designation was added in 2015, many expected the doors to open to new opportunities (and funding) to soon follow. ������ quickly learned that being a minority-serving university is more than enrolling a diverse student body. 

“It’s a shift in mindset from access and equality to equity,” says Watson. “Without equity, we cannot truly be a MSI.” 

Have vs. Serve

The difference between “minority-having” institutions and minority-serving institutions can be traced to the differences between enrollment-based MSIs and mission-based MSIs.

Mission-based MSIs include historically black colleges and universities and tribal colleges and universities. Both institution types were founded with the specific mission to serve Black communities and tribal nations. For mission-based MSIs, serving is woven into the very definition of their existence. There is no question as to who they serve and to their role in addressing racial injustices of the past.

Enrollment-based MSI designations were also created to address issues brought to light by the civil rights movement. But the designations took decades to materialize and be granted to existing colleges based on the percentage of students of defined racial and ethnic groups and income levels. These colleges had been created to serve an undefined, but largely white, population. 

Many MSIs focused on improving access, which was helpful, but stopped far short of truly serving students of color. 

“Despite ������’s minority majority student population and efforts to celebrate diverse cultures, we are still a historically white institution based on our policies, practices, faculty hiring, and more,” notes Watson.

So, does that mean that enrollment-based MSIs like ������ are doomed to superficially serve the needs of its diverse student population and the Las Vegas community? Watson and her colleague, professor , see hard work ahead but hope is on the horizon.

Role Models

They point to schools, like the University of Texas, El Paso, which have been successful enrollment-based MSIs because of their focus on student engagement, resources to encourage student success, and efforts to foster welcoming environments. 

Numerous studies have shown that informal interactions within diverse friendship groups and living spaces sets a positive stage for enhanced cultural competency in addition to reductions in racist behaviors. Watson is reminded of this every time she walks into the Student Union around lunchtime. 

“You’ll see a variety of groups that encompass multiple identities,” notes Watson. “This socialization is just as impactful as formal classes and workshops.”  

Faculty and staff are also key to a successful MSI, as faculty of color are role models and mentors who are instrumental in creating welcoming environments, keeping students on track for graduation and successful careers after college. At most enrollment-based MSIs, including ������, the faculty is still primarily white, making finding those role models for the student body more difficult.

Rincón expounds, “Students need to see themselves represented in front of the classroom. They need mentors who understand their experiences firsthand and who recognize and leverage their cultural assets in the classroom.” 

Simply being designated as an MSI will help with the recruitment of faculty of color. Latinx and Black faculty tend to have a strong sense of purpose and duty to serve their communities, and they often appreciate the difference a college education can make in the lives of their students. So they appear to be more attracted to the promise of what an enrollment-based MSI can become. 

Watson also sees beyond the headcount. “Most faculty of color are at the assistant level. We need to get them through tenure and hire existing full and associate professors of color to mentor junior faculty through the process."

Embracing the Uncomfortable

Rincón and Watson encourage the campus community to prepare for discomfort as ������ continues this conversation.

“It’s an important part of the recognition of getting students, faculty, and staff what they need for success,” Rincón advises. “We feel an energy at ������ that folks want to do this work — it’s just about how we go about fixing policies and practices that have held students, faculty, and staff back.”

������ Provost Chris Heavey recognizes the long road ahead and the need to accelerate the university’s pace of progress. “We need to spread the breadth of this conversation across the university,” he stated at a recent Professors’ Circle discussion on MSIs. “We have an opportunity to serve our community by growing our students into the professors that will come back to serve the next generation.” 

Growing the Future

Watson and Rincón are proof positive of this concept. When Watson stepped into an administrative role in the College of Education, Rincón stepped in to lead the MSI class. In addition to delving into the differences of mission- vs. enrollment-based MSI designations, she leads her students through discussions on funding, faculty issues, and culturally responsive practices both inside and outside of the classroom. 

“We take an asset-based approach to the understanding of MSIs, so we try to focus on what institutions are doing, not what they aren’t doing, so we can assess successes and build on them.”

Looking forward, Rincón hopes to see bold, race-conscious leadership that recognizes past injustices and exclusions. She hopes that by learning from higher education history, universities can bravely respond to the needs of the communities and students they serve.